Related Articles - Contents
  Toggle all descriptions Collapse all descriptions
Learning Difficulties top
# Article Title
1 What is Autism?

Autism is known as a complex developmental disability. Experts believe that Autism presents itself during the first three years of a person's life. The condition is the result of a neurological disorder that has an effect on normal brain function, affecting development of the person's communication and social interaction skills.

People with autism have issues with non-verbal communication, a wide range of social interactions, and activities that include an element of play and/or banter.

ASD stands for Autism Spectrum Disorder. In this text Autism and ASD mean the same. ASDs are any developmental disabilities that have been caused by a brain abnormality. A person with an ASD typically has difficulty with social and communication skills.

A person with ASD will typically also prefer to stick to a set of behaviors and will resist any major (and many minor) changes to daily activities. Several relatives and friends of people with ASDs have commented that if the person knows a change is coming in advance, and has time to prepare for it; the resistance to the change is either gone completely or is much lower.

Autism, a wide-spectrum disorder

Autism (or ASD) is a wide-spectrum disorder. This means that no two people with autism will have exactly the same symptoms. As well as experiencing varying combinations of symptoms, some people will have mild symptoms while others will have severe ones. Below is a list of the most commonly found characteristics identified among people with an ASD.

Social skills

The way in which a person with an ASD interacts with another individual is quite different compared to how the rest of the population behaves. If the symptoms are not severe, the person with ASD may seem socially clumsy, sometimes offensive in his/her comments, or out of synch with everyone else. If the symptoms are more severe, the person may seem not to be interested in other people at all.

Child hiding his face

It is common for relatives, friends and people who interact with someone with an ASD to comment that the ASD sufferer makes very little eye contact. However, as health care professionals, teachers and others are improving their ability to detect signs of autism at an earlier age than before, eye contact among people with autism is improving. In many cases, if the symptoms are not severe, the person can be taught that eye contact is important for most people and he/she will remember to look people in the eye.

A person with autism may often miss the cues we give each other when we want to catch somebody's attention. The person with ASD might not know that somebody is trying to talk to them. They may also be very interested in talking to a particular person or group of people, but does not have the same skills as others to become fully involved. To put it more simply, they lack the necessary playing and talking skills.

Empathy - Understanding and being aware of the feelings of others

A person with autism will find it much harder to understand the feelings of other people. His/her ability to instinctively empathize with others is much weaker than other people's. However, if they are frequently reminded of this, the ability to take other people's feelings into account improves tremendously. In some cases - as a result of frequent practice - empathy does improve, and some of it becomes natural rather than intellectual. Even so, empathy never comes as naturally for a person with autism as it does to others.

Having a conversation with a person with autism may feel very much like a one-way trip. The person with ASD might give the impression that he is talking at people, rather than with or to them. He may love a theme, and talk about it a lot. However, there will be much less exchanging of ideas, thoughts, and feelings than there might be in a conversation with a person who does not have autism.

Almost everybody on this planet prefers to talk about himself/herself more than other people; it is human nature. The person with autism will usually do so even more.

Physical contact

Hands making contact

A number of children with an ASD do not like cuddling or being touched like other children do. It is wrong to say that all children with autism are like that. Many will hug a relative - usually the mother, father, grandmother, grandfather, teacher, and or sibling(s) - and enjoy it greatly. Often it is a question of practice and anticipating that physical contact is going to happen. For example, if a child suddenly tickles another child's feet, he will most likely giggle and become excited and happy. If that child were to tickle the feet of a child with autism, without that child anticipating the contact, the result might be completely different.

Loud noises, some smells, and lights

Alarm clock - loud noise

A person with autism usually finds sudden loud noises unpleasant and quite shocking. The same can happen with some smells and sudden changes in the intensity of lighting and ambient temperature. Many believe it is not so much the actual noise, smell or light, but rather the surprise, and not being able to prepare for it - similar to the response to surprising physical contact. If the person with autism knows something is going to happen, he can cope with it much better. Even knowing that something 'might' happen, and being reminded of it, helps a lot.

Speech

The higher the severity of the autism, the more affected are a person's speaking skills. Many children with an ASD do not speak at all. People with autism will often repeat words or phrases they hear - an event called echolalia.

The speech of a person with ASD may sound much more formal and woody, compared to other people's speech. Teenagers with Asperger's Syndrome can sometimes sound like young professors. Their intonation may sound flat.

Repetitive behaviors

A person with autism likes predictability. Routine is his/her best friend. Going through the motions again and again is very much part of his/her life. To others, these repetitive behaviors may seem like bizarre rites. The repetitive behavior could be a simple hop-skip-jump from one end of the room to the other, repeated again and again for one, five, or ten minutes - or even longer. Another could be drawing the same picture again and again, page after page.

Repetitive photo

People without autism are much more adaptable to changes in procedure. A child without autism may be quite happy to first have a bath, then brush his teeth, and then put on his pajamas before going to bed - even though he usually brushes his teeth first. For a child with autism this change, bath first and then teeth, could completely put him/her out, and they may become very upset. Some people believe that helping a child with autism learn how to cope better with change is a good thing, however, forcing them to accept change like others do could adversely affect their quality of life.

Development happens differently

While a child without autism will develop in many areas at a relatively harmonious rate, this may not be the case for a child with autism. His/her cognitive skills may develop fast, while their social and language skills trail behind. On the other hand, his/her language skills may develop rapidly while their motor skills don't. They may not be able to catch a ball as well as the other children, but could have a much larger vocabulary. Nonetheless, the social skills of a person with autism will not develop at the same pace as other people's.

Learning may be unpredictable

How quickly a child with autism learns things can be unpredictable. They may learn something much faster than other children, such as how to read long words, only to forget them completely later on. They may learn how to do something the hard way before they learn how to do it the easy way.

Physical ticks and stimming

It is not uncommon for people with autism to have ticks. These are usually physical movements that can be jerky. Some ticks can be quite complicated and can go on for a very long time. A number of people with autism are able to control when they happen, others are not. People with ASD who do have ticks often say that they have to be expressed, otherwise the urge does not stop. For many, going through the ticks is enjoyable, and they have a preferred spot where they do them - usually somewhere private and spacious. When parents first see these ticks, especially the convoluted ones, they may experience shock and worry.

Obsessions

People with autism often have obsessions.

Myth

A person with autism feels love, happiness, sadness and pain just like everyone else. Just because some of them may not express their feelings in the same way others do, does not mean at all that they do not have feelings - THEY DO!! It is crucial that the Myth - Autistic people have no feelings - is destroyed. The myth is a result of ignorance, not some conspiracy. Therefore, it is important that you educate people who carry this myth in a helpful and informative way.

Not all people with autism have an incredible gift or savantism for numbers or music. People with autism are ordinary people... with autism.

What is Autism? - Video

What is Autism - Hans Asperger. Discussion from Tony, the father of an 8 year old child with autism, about what Dr. Hans Asperger said in his sentinel paper. Note: this video was produced independently, and is not owned by Medical News Today.

{youtube}kk9-3RxRhRI{/youtube}

Further reading

Autism news

Medical News Today is a leading resource for the latest headlines on autism. So, check out our autism news section. You can also sign up to daily autism news alerts or our weekly digest newsletters to ensure that you stay up-to-date with the latest news.



This what is autism? information section was written by Christian Nordqvist and may not be re-produced in any way without the permission of Medical News Today.

 


2 ADHD and Addiction
Wendy Richardson MA, MFCC, CAS, ADHD and Addiction and Author of the best selling book of the same title.

ADD AND THE FAMILY


Living in families, and raising children can be difficult under the best of circumstances. Many of us had a hard time living in the families that we grew up in. It may be difficult today, living together in the families that we have created. We may feel guilty for not giving our children or partner what we feel they deserve. We may feel painfully aware of how we are not taking care of our own needs. This is especially true if a member, or several members of our family have Attention Deficit Disorder.

As our knowledge of Attention Deficit Disorder grows, we are learning that ADD is not simply a disorder of childhood. ADD is life long condition. Children with ADD grow up to be adults with ADD. People with ADD do not live and grow in a vacuum. They have relationships, children, and create families with people who may or may not have ADD. Therefore, it is essential to help not only the person directly affected by ADD, but the entire family. Attention Deficit Disorder, similar to addictions affects every member in the family. Families do not cause ADD, and yet families need help to live and thrive in spite of the impact of ADD.

We now know that ADD runs in families. It has been estimated that there is a 30% chance that a child with ADD has at least one parent who has ADD. It has also been estimate that there is a 30% chance that that same child will have a sibling with ADD. I frequently work with families where one or both parents have ADD, and one or two of their children also have the condition. Living in a family with ADD can be like living in a five ring circus. There is always someone or something that demands attention.

As parents we want the best for our children, and are often willing to sacrifice our needs for theirs. But what is the impact on the family if one of the parents has untreated Attention Deficit Disorder? Too many times, I hear caring parents say, "Please help my son or daughter. I've dealt with this all my life and can continue to." The problem with this is that it can be incredibly difficult to provide consistent parenting for any child, let alone a child with ADD, if you as the parent have untreated ADD. There is a reason why the airlines request that adults put their oxygen mask on first, so that they are then able to help the children.

Families with ADD have higher incidents of physical, and verbal abuse. Substances such as alcohol, food and drugs are often used to self-medicate the pain and frustration of family ADD. Some parents of children with ADD suffer from Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). PTSD is a condition that occurs when people are subjected to extreme, ongoing stress that is beyond the realm of normal experience. PTSD symptoms include depression, anxiety, sleep disturbances, hyper-vigilance, and re-experiencing of the trauma.

For the for mention reasons, it is imperative that ADD is viewed in the context of the family, or persons environment. Relationship therapy that is specific to addressing the impact of ADD is essential. Family therapy which includes parents and siblings with and without ADD is critical. So often the non-ADD siblings are left out, or feel that they have to somehow make up for the difficulties that their ADD sibling(s) are causing. Educating and treating all members of the family system promotes family wellness.

We have learned from the evolution of the chemical dependency field over that past two decades that treating alcoholics and addicts outside of the context of their relationships is less than helpful. We have also learned that family members of the chemically dependent person also need treatment, so that they too can recover. The same is true with Attention Deficit Disorder. Let us continue to be quick learners as our knowledge of ADD expands. ADD is not caused by poor parenting, or dysfunctional families, and yet the entire family deserves treatment. No one in the family is immune from the impact of Attention Deficit Disorder.

Wendy Richardson M.A., LMFCC specializes in the treatment of ADD and co-related substance abuse. She provides education and therapy for couples and families where ADD is present. She is a writer who speaks nationally ,and provides workshops and trainings on Attention Deficit Disorder.

THE LINK BETWEEN ADD/HD AND EATING DISORDERS


SELF-MEDICATING WITH FOOD


As human beings we find creative ways to decrease our emotional, physical, and spiritual pain. Some people use alcohol and other drugs to ease the pain and frustration of their ADD symptoms. Others use compulsive behaviors such as gambling, spending, or sexual addictions. Eating in ways that are not good for us, but temporarily make us feel better is also a form of self-medicating. Self-medicating is when we use substances and behaviors to change how we feel. The problem with self-medicating is that it initially works, but soon leads to a host of new problems.

Eating can temporarily calm ADD physical and mental restlessness. Eating can be grounding for some people with ADD, helping them focus better while reading, studying, watching television or movies. If your brain is not quick to contain your impulses, you may eat without thinking. Some compulsive overeaters are shocked to realize they have finished a carton of ice cream or a king-size tub of theater popcorn. They were not consciously aware of how much they were eating. Eating puts them into a pleasant trance like state that is a respite from their often active and chaotic ADD brain.

Although we don't think of food as a drug, it can be used as one. We have to eat, but eating too much or too little of certain types of food has consequences. Since there is no way to totally abstain from food, eating disorders are extremely hard to recover from. You may have to abstain from certain foods, perhaps those containing sugar, because they trigger a compulsion for more, yet everywhere you look you see and smell these foods.

WHY FOOD?


Food is legal. It is a culturally acceptable way to comfort ourselves. For some people with ADD food is the first substance that helped them feel calm. Children with ADD will often seek out foods rich with sugar and refined carbohydrates such as candy, cookies, cakes, and pasta. People who compulsively over eat, binge, or binge and purge also eat these types of foods.

It is no accident that binge food is usually high in sugars and carbohydrates, especially when you take into consideration how the ADD brain is slow to absorb glucose. One of the Zametkin PET scan studies, results indicated that "Global cerebral glucose metabolism was 8.1 percent lower in the adults with hyperactivity than in the normal controls..."1 Other research has also confirmed slower glucose metabolism in ADD adults with and without hyperactivity. This suggests that the binge eater is using these foods to change his or her neurochemistry.

SUGAR CRAVING AND HYPERACTIVITY


Researchers have searched for the connection between sugar and hyperactivity. Some studies have reported that sugar causes hyperactivity in children. When these studies have been duplicated, however, the results were not always consistent. The idea that sugar causes hyperactivity is relatively new in our culture, and has not been passed on from previous generations. This is why grandparents are often miffed when they are told not to give their grandchild any sugar. They haven't had the experience of sugar causing hyperactivity.

What if we have been looking at the question backward? What if ADD hyperactivity actually causes people to crave sweets? If the ADD brain is slower to absorb glucose, it would make sense the body would find a way to increase the supply of glucose to the brain as quickly as possible.

I have worked with many ADD adults who are addicted to sugar, especially chocolate which also contains caffeine. They find that eating sugar helps them stay alert, calm, and focused. Prior to ADD treatment many report drinking 6-12 sugar sodas, several cups of coffee with sugar, and constantly nibbling on candy and sweets throughout the day. It is impossible to sort out what is pure sugar craving when it is mixed with the stimulating effects of caffeine on the ADD brain.

THE SEROTONIN CONNECTION


Serotonin is a neurotransmitter that has been associated with symptoms of depression. Serotonin helps regulate sleep, sexual energy, mood, impulses and appetite. Low levels of serotonin can cause us to feel irritable, anxious, and depressed. One way to temporarily increase our serotonin level is to eat foods that are high in sugar and carbohydrates. Our attempts to change our neurochemistry are short lived, however, and we have to eat more and more to maintain feeling of well being. Medications such as Prozac, Paxil and Zoloft work to regulate serotonin. These medications are frequently helpful when used in combination with ADD and eating disorder treatment. Proper levels of serotonin can also help improve impulse control giving the person time to think before they eat.

COMPULSIVE OVER EATING


Most of us overeat at times. We may eat for sheer enjoyment even if we're not hungry, or we may eat more than we intend at a dinner party or celebration. But for some, overeating becomes a compulsion they cannot stop. Compulsive overeaters lose control of their ability to stop eating. They use food to alter their feelings rather than satisfy hunger. Compulsive overeaters tend to crave foods high in carbohydrates, sugars, and salt.

BINGE EATING


Binge eating differs from compulsive overeating in that the binge eater enjoys the rush and stimulation of planning the binge. Buying the food and finding the time and place to binge in secret creates a level of risk and excitement that the ADD brain craves. Large amounts of foods high in carbohydrates and sugars are rapidly consumed in a short period of time. The binge itself may only last fifteen to twenty minutes. Proper levels of serotonin and dopamine aid in impulse control problems that contribute to binge eating and Bulimia.

BULIMIA


Bulimia is binge eating accompanied by purging. The bulimic experiences the rush of planning the binge, which can be very stimulating for the person with ADD. In addition, the bulimic may be stimulated by the satiation binging provides; then, he or she adds an additional dimension to the process: the relief of purging. Many bulimics report entering an altered state of consciousness, experiencing feelings of calmness and euphoria after they vomit. This cleansing provides relief which is short lived, and so the bulimic is soon binging again.

ANOREXIA


Our culture is obsessed with thinness. "Food is OK, but, don't gain weight." No wonder so many adolescent boys and girls, as well as women and men, become imprisoned in binge and purge cycles, chronic dieting, and anorexia nervosa. Anorexia can be deadly. Anorectics have lost their ability to eat in a healthy way. Self-starvation is characterized by loss of control. They are obsessed with thoughts of food, body image, and diet. Anorectics can also use laxatives, diuretics, enemas, and compulsive exercise to maintain their distorted image of thinness.

As we learn more about ADD, we discover that people manifest ADD traits differently. Obsessing on food, exercise, and thinness gives the anorectic a way to focus their chaotic ADD brains. They become over focused on thoughts and behaviors that related to food.

Frequently these people will only become aware of their high level of activity, distractibility, and impulsiveness after they have been in recovery for anorexia. Self starvation curtails hyperactivity.

Distractibility and spaceyness are characteristics of both anorexia and bulimia, whether or not they're accompanied by ADD. In each case the inability to concentrate or focus results because the brain is not being properly nourished. For people with ADD, however, there is a history of attention difficulties that predates the eating disorder. Their concentration, impulse problems, and activity level may not improve when their eating disorder is treated. As a matter of fact, their ADD traits can get worse once they are no longer self-medicating with food, or organizing their lives around food and exercise. If you are someone who has struggled with eating disorders, and suspect you may have ADD, it is important to get an evaluation. Both your eating disorders and your ADD must be treated.

COMPREHENSIVE TREATMENT


It is essential that both ADD and eating disorders are treated. Too many people are struggling with their eating disorders because they have undiagnosed or untreated ADD. When ADD is properly treated the individual is better able to focus and follow through with treatment for their eating disorders. They also have greater control of their impulses, and less of a need to self-medicate their ADD symptoms.

Stimulant medications such as Dexedrine, Ritalin, Desoxyn, and Adderall that work with the neurotransmitter dopamine can be helpful in treating ADD restlessness, impulsiveness, attentional problems, and problems with obsessive thoughts. Medications such as Paxil, Prozac, and Zoloft are useful because they increase serotonin levels, thus helping with impulse control, obsessive thoughts, and decrease agitation.

The key to successful treatment lies in a comprehensive treatment program that address the medical, emotional, social, and physical aspects of both ADD and eating disorders. Recovering from eating disorders takes time, hard work and commitment. Recovering from eating disorders when you have ADD is even tougher. I encourage you to be patient. Put away the whip of contempt, and have compassion for yourself. You've been through a lot. Over the years I have seen many people who were once hopeless and despondent because they could not recover from their eating disorders chart solid courses of recovery once their ADD was treated.

1. Zametkin, Nordahl, Gross, King, Semple, Rumsey, Hamburger, and Cohen, "Cerebral Glucose Metabolism in Adults with Hyperactivity of Childhood Onset," {The New England Journal of Medicine}, 30 (1990).

Wendy Richardson, MA., LMFT, the author of The Link Between ADD And Addiction: Getting The Help You Deserve, is a licensed marriage, family, child therapist and Certified Addiction Specialist in private practice. She is also a consultant, trainer, and speaks at national and international ADD, chemical dependency, and learning disability conferences.

The Link Between ADHD & Addiction


It is common for people with ADHD to turn to addictive substances such as alcohol, marijuana, heroin, prescription tranquilizers, pain medication, nicotine, caffeine, sugar, cocaine and street amphetamines in attempts to soothe their restless brains and bodies. Using substances to improve our abilities, help us feel better, or decrease and numb our feelings is called self-medicating.

Putting Out Fires With Gasoline


The problem is that self-medicating works at first. It provides the person with ADHD relief from their restless bodies and brains. For some, drugs such as nicotine, caffeine, cocaine, diet pills and "speed" enable them to focus, think clearly, and follow through with ideas and tasks. Others chose to soothe their ADHD symptoms with alcohol and marijuana. People who abuse substances, or have a history of substance abuse are not "bad" people. They are people who desperately attempt to self-medicate their feelings, and ADHD symptoms. Self-medicating can feel comforting. The problem is, that self-medicating brings on a host of addiction related problem which over time make people's lives much more difficult. What starts out as a "solution", can cause problems including addiction, impulsive crimes, domestic violence, increased high risk behaviors, lost jobs, relationships, families, and death. Too many people with untreated ADHD, learning, and perceptual disabilities are incarcerated, or dying from co-occurring addiction.

Self-medicating ADD with alcohol and other drugs is like putting out fires with gasoline. You have pain and problems that are burning out of control, and what you use to put out the fires is gasoline. Your life may explode as you attempt to douse the flames of ADD.

A 1996 article in American Scientists states that "In the United States alone there are 18 million alcoholics, 28 million children of alcoholics, 6 million cocaine addicts, 14.9 million who abuse other substances, 25 million addicted to nicotine."1

Who Will Become Addicted?


Everyone is vulnerable to abusing any mind altering substance to diminish the gut wrenching feelings that accompany ADHD. There are a variety of reasons why one person becomes addicted and another does not. No single cause for addictions exists; rather, a combination of factors is usually involved. Genetic predisposition, neurochemistry, family history, trauma, life stress, and other physical and emotional problems contribute. Part of what determines who becomes addicted and who does not is the combination and timing of these factors. People may have genetic predispositions for alcoholism, but if they choose not to drink they will not become alcoholic. The same is true for drug addictions. If an individual never smokes pot, snorts cocaine, shoots or smokes heroin, he or she will never become a pot, coke, or heroin addict.

The bottom line is that people with ADHD as a whole are more likely to medicate themselves with substances than those who do not have ADHD. Dr.s Hallowell and Ratey estimate that 8 to 15 million Americans suffer from ADD, other researchers estimated that as many as 30-50% of them use drugs and alcohol to self-medicate their ADHD symptoms.2 This does not include those who use food, and compulsive behaviors to self-medicate their ADD brains and the many painful feelings associated with ADHD. When we see ADD it is important to look for substance abuse and addictions. And when we see substance abuse and addictions, it is equally important to look for ADHD.

Prevention and Early Intervention


"Just Say No!" may sound simple, but if it was that simple we would not have millions of children, adolescents, and adults using drugs every day. For some their biological and emotional attraction to drugs is so powerful, that they cannot conceptualize the risks of self-medication. This is especially true for the person with ADHD who may have an affinity for risky, stimulating experiences. This also applies to the person with ADHD who is physically and emotionally suffering from untreated ADHD restlessness, impulsiveness, low energy, shame, attention and organization problems, and a wide range of social pain.3 It is very difficult to say no to drugs when you have difficulties controlling your impulses, concentrating, and are tormented by a restless brain or body.

The sooner we treat children, adolescents, and adults with ADHD the more likely we are to help them to minimize or eliminate self-medicating. Many well meaning parents, therapists and medical doctors are fearful that treating ADHD with medication will lead to addiction. Not all people with ADHD need to take medication. For those who do, however, prescribed medication that is closely monitored can actually prevent and minimize the need to self-medicate. When medication helps people to concentrate, control their impulses, and regulate their energy level, they are less likely to self-medicate.

Untreated ADHD and Addiction Relapse


Untreated ADHD contributes to addictive relapse, and at best can be a huge factor in recovering people feeling miserable, depressed, unfulfilled, and suicidal. Many individuals in recovery have spent countless hours in therapy working through childhood issues, getting to know their inner child, and analyzing why they abuse substances and engage in addictive behaviors. Much of this soul searching, insight, and release of feelings is absolutely necessary to maintain recovery. But what if after years of group and individual therapy, and continued involvement in addiction programs your client still impulsively quit jobs and relationships, can't follow through with their goals, and has a fast chaotic, or slow energy level. What if, along with addiction your client also has ADHD?

Treating Both ADHD and Addictions


It is not enough to treat addictions and not treat ADHD, nor is it enough to treat ADHD and not treat co-occurring addiction. Both need to be diagnosed, and treated for the individual to have a chance at ongoing recovery. Now is the time to share information so that addiction specialists, and those treating ADHD can work together. It is critical that chemical dependency practitioners understand that ADHD is based in one's biology and responds well to a comprehensive treatment program that sometimes includes medications. It is also important for practitioners to support the recovering persons involvement in Twelve Step programs and help them to work with their fear about taking medication.

A COMPREHENSIVE TREATMENT PROGRAM CONSISTS OF:


* A professional evaluation for ADHD and co-occurring addiction.
* Continued involvement in addiction recovery groups or Twelve Step programs.
* Education on how ADHD impacts each individual's life, and the lives of those who love them.
* Building social, organization, communication, and work or school skills.
* ADHD coaching and support groups.
* Closely monitored medication when medication is indicated.
* Supporting individuals decisions to take medication or not ( in time they may realize on their own that medication is an essential part of their recovery).
* Stages of Recovery

It is important to treat people with ADHD and addiction according to their stage of recovery. Recovery is a process that can be divided into four stages, pre-recovery, early recovery, middle recovery, and long term recovery.

PRE-RECOVERY: Is the period before a person enters treatment for their addictions. It can be difficult to sort out ADHD symptoms from addictive behavior and intoxication. The focus at this point is to get the person into treatment for their chemical and/or behavioral addiction. This is NOT the time to treat ADHD with psycho stimulant medication.

EARLY RECOVERY: During this period it is also difficult, but not impossible to sort out ADHD from the symptoms of abstinence which include, distractibility, restlessness, mood swings, confusions, and impulsivity. Much of what looks like ADHD can disappear with time in recovery. The key is in the life long history of ADHD symptoms dating back to childhood. In most cases early recovery is NOT the time to use psycho stimulant medication, unless the individual's ADHD is impacting his or her ability to attain sobriety.

MIDDLE RECOVERY: By now addicts, and alcoholics, are settling into recovery. This is usually the time when they seek therapy for problems that did not disappear with recovery. It is much easier to diagnose ADHD at this stage; and medication can be very effective when indicated.

LONG TERM RECOVERY: This is an excellent time to treat ADHD with medications when warranted. By now most people in recovery have lives that have expanded beyond intense focus on staying clean and sober. Their recovery is an important part of their life, and they also have the flexibility to deal with other problems such as ADHD.

Medication and Addiction


Psychostimulant medication when properly prescribed and monitored is effective for approximately 75-80% of people with ADHD. These medications include Ritalin, Dexedrine, Adderall, and Desoxyn. It is important to note that when these medications are used to treat ADHD the dosage is much less that what addicts use to get high. When people are properly medicated they should not feel high or "speedy, instead they will report increases in their abilities to concentrate, control their impulses, and moderate their activity level. The route of delivery is also quite different. Medication to treat ADHD is taken orally, where street amphetamines are frequently injected and smoked.

Non stimulant medications such as Wellbutrin, Prozac, Nortriptyline, Effexor and Zoloft can also be effective in relieving ADHD symptoms for some people. These medications are frequently used in combination with a small dose of a psychostimulant. Recovering alcoholics and addicts are not flocking to doctors to get psychostimulant medication to treat their ADHD. The problem is that many are hesitant for good reasons to use medication, especially psycho stimulants. It has been my experience that once a recovering person becomes willing to try medication the chance of abuse is very rare. Again the key is a comprehensive treatment program that involves close monitoring of medication, behavioral interventions, ADHD coaching and support groups, and continued participation in addiction recovery programs.

There is Hope


For the last few years I have witnessed the transformation of lives that were once ravaged by untreated ADHD and addiction. I have worked with people who had relapsed in and out of treatment programs for ten to twenty years attain ongoing and fulfilling sobriety once their ADHD was treated. I have Witnessed people with ADHD achieve recovery once their addictions were treated.

"Each day I understand more about how pervasive ADHD is in my life. My clients, friends, family and colleagues are my teachers. I wouldn't wish ADHD and addictions on anyone, but if these are the genetic cards that you have been dealt, your life can still be fascinating and fulfilling."
3 Behavioral Treatment for ADHD: A General Overview

David Rabiner, Ph.D.
Durham, N.C— 2000

The information presented below is intended to provide a general overview of a behavioral approach to improving children's behavior. Designing and implementing an effective behavioral plan will vary from one child to the next, however, and consultation with an experienced child mental health professional is recommended. Despite the well documented benefits of stimulant medication for treating ADHD, medication is no panacea, and some children with ADHD should not receive it. There are several reasons for this.

First, although medication helps the majority of children with ADHD, as many as 20% derive no real benefit from medication. Second, some children experience side effects that prevent them from receiving medication on an extended basis. Third, many children who benefit from medication still have difficulties with primary ADHD symptoms or associated problems which must be targeted via other means. Fourth, some children with ADHD can have their symptoms managed effectively without medication (this is most likely to be true, however, when symptoms are relatively mild.)

In addition to these reasons, some children have extremely strong objections to taking medication—this may be more likely to occur with teenagers. In these circumstances, trying to force medication on a child can create more problems than it solves. For all these reasons, other treatments are often necessary—some would say always necessary—to effectively treat ADHD.

An important non-medical approach used in treating children with ADHD is known as behavior therapy or behavior management. Behavior therapy is based on several simple and sensible notions about what leads children to behave in socially appropriate ways. One reason is that children generally want to please their parents and feel good about themselves when their parent is proud of them. When the relationship between parent and child is basically positive, this is a very important source of motivation. A second reason that children behave appropriately is to obtain positive consequences for doing so (i.e. privileges or rewards). Finally, children will behave appropriately to avoid the negative consequences that follow inappropriate behavior.

The goal of behavior therapy, therefore, is to increase the frequency of desirable behavior by increasing the child's interest in pleasing parents and by providing positive consequences when the child behaves. Inappropriate behavior is reduced by consistently providing negative consequences when such behavior occurs. This is a simplified, but not unreasonable view, of what behavior therapy is all about.


"My child and I seem to be in conflict almost all the time and I don't think he cares about pleasing me at all. How can I change this?"


Fostering a Postive Parent-Child Relationship


Let's begin by focusing on children's desire to please their parents. Often times, relationships between parents and children become fraught with conflict and angry feelings in response to the frustration caused by ADHD symptoms. Good times between parent and child can dwindle to almost nothing, and the child's desire to please his or her parent can evaporate. After all, most of us are not interested in pleasing someone that we constantly argue with. Unfortunately, when this important positive source of motivation for good behavior disappears, parents have to rely more exclusively on the threat of punishment to induce compliance. This generally makes for ongoing conflict and struggle.

In many situations, therefore, the first step in behavioral treatment is to enhance the amount of positive feelings between parent and child. One helpful way to do this is to set aside a certain amount of time each day (30 minutes is certainly sufficient) that is designated as the child's "special time". During this time, the child gets to choose the activity (it must be within reason, of course), and the parent's sole focus is on trying to have a good time with his or her child.

During this time, it is important to avoid asking too many questions or giving commands, and, instead, to simply tune into what your child is doing in an interested and complimentary way. For example, if your child is building a tower with blocks, the comment "Don't you think it would be better if you used these bigger blocks first?", will be less helpful than a comment like "Boy, the tower your building is really getting tall!"

The goal of this time together is to build up good feelings between your child and you so that your child will become more invested in wanting to please you. When this occurs, discipline and limit setting generally go much more smoothly. When parents first begin to try this, they are often surprised to that chores, homework, or errands are getting done. The absence of this special time can be a real loss to both parent and child. Working to make it part of your daily routine can yield substantial benefits in the parents' relationship with their children.


Using Positive Reinforcement


The second focus of behavioral treatment involves providing your child with positive consequences for behaving in appropriate ways. The simple logic is that you can increase the frequency of desired behavior (e.g. putting away toys) by providing rewards when such behavior occurs. At the simplest level, this requires nothing more than noticing when your child is doing something you want to encourage (e.g. playing quietly) and making sure to comment on it ("Your doing such a nice job of playing quietly. I really appreciate that.").

Think about the kinds of behavior you want to encourage, make sure your child understands what you want him or her to do, and then be sure to praise your child whenever you happen to observe it occurring. This simple technique of noticing good behavior is easy to overlook but can be quite helpful. I often recommend to parents that they make a conscious effort to catch their child doing something good at least five times a day and to point it out. When children are convinced that their parents notice and appreciate their efforts at behaving well, it frequently increases their desire to do so.

In addition to these "social rewards", behavioral treatment also involves providing your child with concrete rewards and/or privileges for appropriate behavior. As an example, suppose your child has developed the problematic habit of talking back. You tell him to put away his toys and he tells you "not now, later". One way to increase your child's compliance is to make a tangible reward or privilege contingent on his following your request. For example, you could explain that each time he does what he is told, he will earn a point. These points can then be used to "purchase" a privilege such as access to TV, computer time, etc.

Designing a good behavior plan and implementing it effectively is not easy, and parents may often require professional assistance to do this successfully. Although the specifics of a good plan will vary from child to child and from parent to parent, there are several general principles that are important to keep in mind:

 

Be very clear about what behavior is expected of your child in order to earn the reward and make sure your child's understands this.
"Picking up your toys and putting them away the first time I ask" is more specific.
Make sure that the expectation you have for your child is reasonable—do not set you and your child up for failure by having expectations that are not appropriate for your child's age.
It is always a good idea to reflect on what you expect from your child and consider whether your expectations are reasonable. For example, punishing a 5 year old for being unable to sit quietly at the dinner table for an hour will generally create problems because most 5 year olds simply can not do this. For children with ADHD, behavioral expectations need to take this into account in addition to the child's age.
Don't try to work on too many different things at one time.
It is generally better to focus on a couple of things that are really important rather than taking on everything at once. Choose your battles carefully and selectively!
Let your child participate in choosing the types of rewards he or she can earn.
Children are generally more invested in this type of program when they have some input in itís design. Try to create the feeling that this is something that you are doing with your child rather than something you are doing to your child.
Design the program so your child has a good chance to experience some initial success.
It is important that the child experience some initial success in order to maintain and enhance their motivation. As their behavior improves, you can gradually raise the criterion required to earn rewards.
Be sure to provide lots of social rewards (e.g. praise) in addition to the more tangible rewards that can be earned.
This is a great way to increase your childís desire to please you and to increase the amount of positive feelings between you and your child.
Be consistent.
For this approach to succeed you have to apply it consistently. Using the program one day but not the next, or failing to provide rewards when they are earned, is a sure fire way to keep this from being helpful.

"Isn't this bribing my child? Why should he be rewarded for things he should do anyway?"


Parents are often concerned that providing their child with rewards for behaving appropriately is nothing more than bribery. The way I prefer to look at this, however, is that you are providing your child with the opportunity to earn extra privileges for behaving in a more mature and cooperative manner.

An analogy to the adult workplace may be useful here. If your boss promises a promotion and raise for a specified level of productivity are you being bribed, or are you being given the chance to earn a deserved reward for a job well done? If your child's behavior improves shouldn't he or she have access to more privileges than when they were behaving poorly? That is really all that is being talked about here—the main difference with what most parents already try to do is that the expectations and rewards for meeting those expectations are made more explicit.

 

Using Negative Consequences to Reduce Misbehavior


In addition to using positive reinforcement to encourage good behavior, behavioral treatment also relies on negative consequences or punishment to reduce undesirable behavior. Simply stated, when a particular behavior is consistently followed by negative consequences for a child, it should diminish in frequency and intensity.

For example, suppose you are trying to reduce your child's tendency to "talk back" and this is being targeted in your behavioral treatment plan. Here is a general approach one might take.

* First, your child would need to understand exactly what you mean by "talking back" so it is clear what should not be done.
* Second, you would want to teach your child an acceptable way to disagree with you - how he or she is allowed to express disagreement and how they can not.
* Third, as discussed above, you would review with your child the rewards they will earn for not talking back and for expressing disagreements in an acceptable way.
* Finally, you would discuss with your child what privileges they will lose each time they "talk back". For example, talking back could result in their having to take a "time out", losing TV time, having to go to bed early, ect. If you are using a token system where your child is accumulating tokens that can be used to purchase rewards, talking back can result in the loss of a pre-specified number of tokens.

By setting things up this way, what you are trying to do is to make sure your child understands that there is simply no pay-off for bad behavior. Instead, when he or she acts appropriately, it will always result in good things coming their way. In contrast, when behavioral expectations are not met, the consequences are always negative.

IMPORTANT—Try hard not to overdo the negative consequences. Children tend to get discouraged if they are used too frequently and can lose interest in the program as a result. If you find yourself having to resort to negative consequences too frequently, it's important to take a careful look at what may be going wrong with an eye towards redesigning the program.


Have a Game Plan!


Now it would be wonderful if the first time you used a negative consequence as discussed above, it effectively ended your child's misbehavior. As we all know, however, this is often not the case. Instead, you may take away TV time because of some misbehavior, and your child either ignores you or says he "doesn't care" and continues with the problematic behavior.

It is easy to become frustrated and angry in situations like this. At such times it is easy (I know from experience because this is a mistake I make myself) to blurt out a punishment that is born of frustration and will be difficult if not impossible to enforce:

* "Your grounded for the next 2 weeks!"
* "That's it! No more birthday party for you!"

I know that I've had the experience of shouting out something like this, and realizing right away that it wasnít something I would stick with. In fact, it wasn't even something I should stick with because it was excessive and unreasonable. You are then left with the uncomfortable choice of enforcing something unreasonable to show your child that you mean business or backing down. Choose the former and your child is justifiably upset and you wind up feeling guilty. Choose the latter and your child gets the idea that punishments don't matter because you don't stick with them anyway.

One helpful way to avoid this dilemma is to plan out, IN ADVANCE, a graded series of punishments for persistent misbehavior. For example, when your child initially fails to comply you could impose a five-minute time-out. If the non-compliance continues, you could say "If you don't do what you're told now, the time out will increase to ten minutes."

Continued non-compliance results in loss of TV, in addition to the time out. After that, an earlier bed time could be imposed. You have to decide what specifics make sense, of course, but the general point is to have an escalating series of consequences that you can calmly but firmly announce and calmly ,but firmly, enforce. (It is best that these consequences do not extend into the following day so the new day can get off to a fresh start.)

Having this plan in mind can help you to keep your cool and prevent you from blurting out a punishment that is not going to be helpful. If you can stick with game plan, your child should learn that there is something nothing to be gained by persistent disobedience.


Don't Teach Your Child to Misbehave


Here is a pattern that is easy to fall into and which is associated with increasing misbehavior and non-compliance. You ask or tell your child to do something—like pick up his toys. Your child ignores you and keeps on playing. You repeat your request and your child ignores you again. You get angry and intensify your demand; your child gets angry in response and starts to tantrum. After a few more cycles of this, you are both very angry. To keep things from exploding, you drop your demand, send your child away, and pick up the toys yourself because "it's not worth all the hassle and aggravation" trying to make your child do it.

Most parents have been through something like this. With children who have ADHD and are also oppositional, this is a distressingly frequent occurrence. Unfortunately, what a child learns from this type of exchange is that if they just hang in there and persist in being defiant, they will eventually get their way. What happens, therefore, is that your child's disobedience is actually being REWARDED. This can result in things going downhill because your child is being taught that defiance pays off.

It is important to chose your battles carefully. Once you demand something of your child, BE SURE TO FOLLOW THROUGH WITH IT. If your child persists in being defiant, try using the graded series of consequences as discussed above. Your child needs to see that you mean business, and that there is ABSOLUTELY NO PAYOFF for being disobedient.

 

"This type of behavioral approach sounds like something that would be useful with all children. Is there anything different about using this approach with a child who has ADHD?"


Using a combination of special time, positive reinforcement, and negative consequences to encourage good behavior is, of course, a technique that can be useful with all children. Although the basic principles are similar for children with and without ADHD, factors specific to ADHD generally require certain modifications to be made. Several of these important modifications are:

Children with ADHD generally require more frequent feedback about how they are doing in meeting the parent (or teacher's) expectations.
Research has consistently demonstrated that children with ADHD perform better when they are given frequent feedback about their performance. Thus, if the behavior you are targeting is "following directions", it is better to provide your child with feedback about how well they are following directions every hour, rather than doing this once at the end of the day. The actual time interval is something to experiment with; the important point is that a child with ADHD needs frequent feedback for behavioral programs to be effective.
Children with ADHD do better with short term goals than long term goals.
This follows from the above. Along with more frequent feedback, children with ADHD generally require shorter intervals between the opportunity to earn rewards. For example, promising a weekend reward for good behavior during the week may be too far in the future to function as an effective motivator for a child with ADHD. Daily rewards, or even more frequent opportunity to earn privileges, will often be necessary. Providing a child with points or "tokens" for good behavior that can be used to purchase more tangible rewards (e.g. TV time; Nintendo time; getting to rent a video) can be useful because they can be frequently and easily dispensed, and have value because of their connection to desired activities and objects.
Children with ADHD require more frequent reminders about what is expected of them and what they can earn for meeting those expectations.
For this approach to be effective, it needs to occupy a prominent place in a child's mind. Children who forget what their behavior goals are and what they are trying to earn by achieving those goals are unlikely to be successful. For a child with ADHD, frequent reminders about the goals and rewards are important. This can be done in the context of providing feedback on how the child is doing.
Children with ADHD often require frequent changes in the program to remain interested in it.
Those of you who have already tried various behavior plans may be well aware of this. It is not uncommon for a child to get off to a great start and then lose interest in earning any rewards. The best way to combat this is to try change the program to keep it feeling "new". This can be done by changing the rewards (e.g. one day the reward to be earned in TV time, the next day it is getting to stay up an extra half hour, ect.) If your using tokens, changing the actual token can also be helpful. For example, one week pennies might be used, the next week marbles, the next week stickers, ect. Obviously, this all depends on the age of the child and what his or her interests happen to be. It certainly takes plenty of hard work and creativity on parents' part.

"What kinds of behaviors can be addressed with this type of approach?"


In theory, virtually any type of behavior can be targeted using a behavioral treatment approach. For example, primary ADHD symptoms such as not completing tasks can be targeted by providing rewards for task completion. Symptoms such as interrupting and talking out of turn can be targeted in similar ways. Associated difficulties such as deliberate non-compliance, aggression, ect. can also be targeted in a behavioral treatment plan. Regardless of what behavior is being targeted it is essential to be sure that:

* the child understands what is being expect of him or her
* the expectation is reasonable and something the child is capable of doing
* the child understands what rewards can be earned by meeting the expectation
* the child understands what the negative consequences will be for not meeting the expectation
* you follow through with what you say you are going to do

Remember, don't try to take on too many things at once. Try to set things up so the child has a good chance to experience some early success. Don't expect or require perfection. Even a small improvement is still an improvement.

 

"I don't think this will work because it's impossible to enforce consequences with my child. Trying to enforce a punishment just makes him angrier."


Unfortunately, things can get to this point. Even in these situations, however, sometimes one parent has more success than the other. For children with ADHD who are also oppositional, fathers often seem to have greater success than mothers.

If this is the case, one approach is for mom to calmly and firmly attempt to induce compliance from the child and to be clear about what the consequences for continued non-compliance will be. If the child refuses to comply, make it clear that when dad gets home the child will need to do what is being demanded and that the consequences will be enforced at that time. PLUS, an additional negative consequence will also be administered.

By refusing to listen to mom, therefore, they are not getting out of what they don't want to do, but only delaying the inevitable. In fact, by not listening to mom, they will actually be making things worse. The intent here is to keep mom from getting into an unsuccessful and escalating battle with the child while making it clear to the child that there is no pay off for not listening to mom. For this approach to work, cooperation between parents and support for each otherís efforts is essential.

 

"What if neither parent can get their child to comply?"


This is sometimes the case. If both parents are unable to induce compliance from their child, and their best efforts are not successful, consultation with an experienced child mental health professional is essential. The longer behavioral difficulties persist the harder they are to change and it is critical to stop an escalating cycle of misbehavior as quickly as possible.

The ideas discussed above are intended to provide parents with a general overview of a behavioral approach to improving children's behavior. In many cases, consultation with an experienced child mental health professional will increase the success that parents experience with this approach.
Neuroscience top
# Article Title
1 Re-wiring the brain

brain01.jpg

Plasticity comes into play at the deepest levels of brain structure. In response to the right stimuli, neural connections can be rewired and refined, the brain’s gray matter can thicken, and new neurons can be produced. Scientists call this natural adaptive ability brain plasticity or neuroplasticity. Harnessing this ability can have dramatic and sometimes life-changing effects.

There is now widespread consensus among neuroscientists that the brain retains its ability to change throughout life, but that wasn’t always the case. Just a few decades ago, most scientists believed that different areas of the brain were “hard-wired” shortly after birth to handle different aspects of brain function. A small cohort of neuroscientists challenged that idea. They argued that certain cognitive changes, such as recovery from stroke or the learning of new skills, demonstrated that the brain had the capability to change itself at any age given the right conditions. Over the past 20 years, scientists have shown – in one brain area after another and in system after system – that the brain is actually highly adaptive (or plastic) in adults and remains so throughout life.

This discovery has sparked a revolution in brain health and science. The promise includes a broad range of exciting applications, from enhancing cognitive performance to reversing serious disorders.

Research has shown that engaging the brain’s plasticity to drive beneficial changes requires exact stimuli delivered in the appropriate sequence with precise timing. The training must be intensive, repetitive, and progressively challenging. Individuals must be strongly engaged in the training, paying close attention. It’s all about the mind’s vitality–nurturing it, reclaiming it and giving it strength.
2 Brain Training

Neuroplasticity Research Offers Hope to People with Dyslexia

Your brain is plastic—but don’t worry, that’s good news. It means you can learn new things and correct brain errors throughout your lifespan—even into your old age, although it does work best during your youth. This con-cept of “neuroplasticity” is revolutionary and relatively new—and nowhere does it offer more hope than in the treatment of learning disorders such as dyslexia.

Dyslexia affects vision and hearing as well as the ability to read, write and spell. Typically found in people with normal or even superior intelligence, it can lead to many problems in school and a host of behavioral issues such as underachievement, misdiagnoses, low self esteem, social isolation, and a plethora of variations on human suffering not always visible to others. But all that’s changing.

Brain research and a growing focus on the prospect that brains can be rewired are offering promising approaches to childhood and adult learning disorders, resulting in new programs and treatments for dyslexia.

And such intervention is key because it’s estimated that approximately 10 percent of the U.S. population has dyslexia. Researchers now believe the disorder has different causes. But although it appears in various forms, dyslexia always affects reading—an important skill that children learn late compared to the age when they typically learn to talk. So why this gap?

“Reading is one of the hardest things our brains do,” said dyslexia researcher Dr. Christopher Walsh, head of the Genetics Division at Children’s Hospital in Boston. “It demands we use many different parts of our brain at once.”

In a recent study, Walsh and his team looked at patients with PNH (periventricular nodular heterotopia), a type of dyslexia caused by a rare genetic disorder. Such patients process language slowly and have difficulty reading, which Walsh discovered was most likely caused by disruptions in their brains’ “white matter.” Brain imaging showed that PNH subjects had disorganized bundles of the nerve fibers that are abundant in white matter. These brain bundles, which are usually highly efficient highways between brain cells, erratically tracked around clumps of “gray matter” deposited in the wrong places—deep into the brain’s white matter. (The brain’s gray matter is a lavish coating of neurons over the cerebral cortex that is usually thought of as the center of intelligence.) The subjects’ PNH brain disorganization meant that their nerve connections slowed down.

But why look at a brain condition as rare as PNH—a condition most people with dyslexia don’t have? Walsh defended the practical as well as the academic benefits of basic research, arguing that brain studies offer a better understanding of all the different varieties of dyslexia in the world.

“The faster we can learn what a patient’s problem is, the faster we can convert that to better treatment,” Walsh said in an interview posted on the hospital’s Web site. And by developing a clearer understanding of what the various forms of dyslexia might be, practitioners can better tailor treatments to each child’s specific needs. “The more we know about these genetic disorders, the earlier we can intervene,” Walsh said, noting that such knowledge could translate into treatments starting at birth.

A second study coming out of Children’s Hospital in Boston recently looked at another piece of the dyslexia puzzle: problems in processing sounds and difficulties in linking sounds to letters on a page. The study—published in the journal Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience in October and led by Nadine Gaab of the Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory at Children’s in Boston—used brain-imaging and brain-training software to examine and modify the difficulties children with dyslexia have with language sounds.

Gaab believes the study’s findings could eventually help with early intervention and allow dyslexia to be diagnosed before children reach the age of reading. She also said the research suggests new ways of treating dyslexia, such as music training.

The Gaab study came about in part because of the theories and practical inventions of brain-research pioneer Paula Tallal, co-director of the Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience at Rutgers University in New Jersey. Tallal, in fact, is one of the co-developers of the brain-training software that Gaab and her colleagues used in their work.

In the 1970s, Tallal introduced the idea that children with dyslexia and reading problems could have an underlying issue with processing sounds. She helped develop software designed to rewire stuttering brains, which were increasingly seen as malleable. However, her auditory ideas had never been tested through brain imaging until Gaab came along and tried it. Gaab imaged how the brains of 9- to 12-year-old children responded to fast-moving versus slow-moving sounds, in addition to comparing the brains of normal children to those with developmental dyslexia. Although Gaab didn’t study language sounds themselves, her work is pertinent because general sound perception in infants affects later language skills by creating the brain maps used in speaking and reading.

For instance, infants with dyslexia often have trouble with faster-moving sounds. An example is the rapid “d” at the start of “Dada” or “Daddy.” Children with dyslexia don’t hear it rush past very well. Their brain map for the “d” sound and other quick sounds can be messy and out of kilter—making later reading tasks difficult.

Enter software that trains the brain. Tallal and several colleagues developed software games featuring sounds, which became part of a suite of educational computer products known as Fast ForWord (FFW) language software, developed by Scientific Learning, an Oakland, Calif., company founded by Tallal and other scientists.

Gaab’s study used FFW and included brain scans of children taken before and after they underwent the FFW training. Results showed that these sound-training exercises not only improved reading, they could literally rewire the brain—and researchers have the scanned brain images to prove it.

Preceding Gaab’s just-published work were numerous studies both in this country and around the world that compiled before-and-after data showing that all kinds of students, not just those with learning disorders, could improve their language skills through FFW training.

The FFW Web site (www.scilearn.com) lists 22 special education programs in the United States that report improved student language performance through FFW training, with educators citing improvements in phonological awareness, oral-language skills, cognitive test scores as well as reading advances.

In fact, educators are using FFW software for a whole range of students—from at-risk children, to gifted and talented students, to underserved groups such as American Indians, to children learning English as a second language—and FFW reports positive results for all of them.

In addition, FFW brain-training programs are now in use in about 40 countries. Cheryl Chia, director of Brain Revolution Pte Ltd., based in Singapore, oversees FFW programs at six Brain Revolution centers in Malaysia, Jakarta and China. In an e-mail to The Washington Diplomat, she said that Brain Revolution students typically work on FFW programs 50 minutes to 100 minutes a day, five days a week, for six to eight weeks. “We usually see improvements … in the areas of listening, attention, language, reading and comprehension,” Chia noted.

A study at a Singapore public school that examined children with auditory processing disorder (APD) before and after they went through Brain Revolution’s FFW programs confirmed that the children achieved “significant gains” in reading and phonemic-decoding ability according to standard test measures.

Other international FFW advocates report similar positive results. Catherine Ruckert, head of the Assisted Learning Center in Starnberg, Germany, is an FFW representative serving Germany and Austria. “I have been using the program for the last six years with students with learning disabilities and those with English as a second language—in total with more than 150 students in seven countries,” she told The Diplomat by e-mail.

“Research has shown that 90 percent of all learning disabilities are language based and have an auditory component. The original research conducted by professors Tallal and [Michael] Merznich showed that specific, repetitive, systematic training in the form of computer games could … rewire the language centers in the left cerebral cortex,” Ruckert explained. “FFW is actually a series of 11 interactive computer programs based on that research.”

Noting that Tallal’s early research showed 12 to 18 months’ worth of gains in language skills in a span of eight weeks, she added: “My own research … showed similar responses. Our learning-impaired [students] showed improvement in attention, processing speed, auditory memory, understanding instructions, and use of logic and reasoning. They also showed huge gains in reading comprehension and spelling.”

Ruckert has used the program to raise achievement levels among her under-performing students, “improving their quality of life,” and delighting their parents in the process. “The games are fun,” she concluded, “but make no mistake—they provide a real cerebral workout.”

FFW is not the only brain-training program that’s being scrupulously researched. A Canadian group at the University of Alberta has developed card and board games called “Prep,” which are designed to improve information processing in children with dyslexia, as well as a similar cognitive rehabilitation program called “Cogent,” which is helping young indigenous preschool students in Canada with their reading, memory and organizational skills. The programs are currently being tested in other countries, including China, Spain, Japan and India.

In fact, at India’s Allahabad University, students and faculty affiliated with a neuroscience lab are working on a computer-based cognitive retraining program called Brain Function Therapy and combining it with Prep games. Allahabad scientists intend to look at the effects of the package on both brain and behavior to help children with dyslexia.

Learning disabilities have attracted new government attention on both sides of the Atlantic. Back in Washington, on Nov. 9, Harvey Fineberg, president of the Institute of Medicine (IOM), a nonprofit that advises the U.S. government, recommended that the country create a “comprehensive disability monitoring system” that could inform policymakers. He also recommended better enforcement of the Americans with Disabilities Act, with a focus on insurance coverage for assistive technologies and services.

A number of schools in the Washington metropolitan area already provide special services for children with learning disorders and developmental dyslexia.

First among equals is the much-honored Lab School of Washington, where board members, students and staff are grieving the recent passing of the school’s leader, Sally Smith, who founded the prestigious school in 1967. Lab, which serves students ages 5 to 19, has been internationally recognized for its innovative programs for children and adults with learning disabilities. In fact, over 90 percent of Lab School students go on to college.

In Maryland, there is the Chelsea School for children with learning disabilities, located in Silver Spring, as well as the Siena School, also in Silver Spring, which was profiled in the November 2006 Education Section of The Washington Diplomat.

In Virginia, meanwhile, the Commonwealth Academy serves 61 children with learning disabilities or attention deficit disorder in grades six through 12.

Specialized schools such as these, improvements in the overall education system, and groundbreaking research are clearly changing the face of dyslexia as we know it. In fact, a recent report compiled by Julie Logan, a professor of entrepreneurship at the Cass Business School in London, found that a high proportion of dyslexics in the United States successfully run their own businesses.

According to a December article in the New York Times, Logan reported that more than a third of the entrepreneurs she had surveyed identified themselves as dyslexic—concluding that dyslexics were more likely than non-dyslexics to delegate authority, excel in oral communication and problem-solving, and were twice as likely to own two or more businesses.

She attributed this to earlier and more effective intervention by American schools, as well as to the natural strategies dyslexics develop to offset their weaknesses in written communication and organizational ability—strategies particularly well suited to small businesses. “The willingness to delegate authority gives them a significant advantage over non-dyslexic entrepreneurs,” Logan said, “who tend to view their business as their baby and like to be in total control.”


Carolyn Cosmos is a contributing writer for The Washington Diplomat.